THE PIVOT POINT
A small organization with a lean administrative team recognized that their HR systems, tools, and processes had developed in a reactive, piece-by-piece fashion over time. While some tools worked well, others were outdated, underused, or not configured to support the team’s evolving needs. Recruitment, onboarding, communication, and performance processes were all managed through different systems, creating gaps, redundancies, and inefficiencies.
Leadership needed a clear understanding of what was working, what wasn’t, and where technology or process improvements could strengthen operations. They sought a strategic roadmap to help them modernize and streamline the employee experience without overburdening staff or investing in unnecessary tools.
.
THE PARTNERSHIP
Working closely with administrative leadership and team representatives to conduct an objective, a comprehensive assessment was performed on the organization’s HR landscape. This collaborative approach allowed us to:
· Understand the practical realities of a small but multi-functional workforce
· Evaluate how existing tools supported (or hindered) day-to-day operations
· Align HR needs with organizational goals and long-term sustainability
· Create a future-focused roadmap that balanced efficiency with scalability
The partnership was rooted in clarity, practicality, and prioritization, ensuring recommendations were actionable and right-sized for the organization.
THE PROCESS
The engagement consisted of:
1. HR Structure & Systems Review
We began with a full assessment of the organization’s HR systems, including:
· HRIS functionality and configuration
· Recruitment and applicant tracking tools
· Onboarding workflows and documentation
· Performance management tools or practices
· Communication channels and documentation methods
· File management and record-keeping practices
This phase provided a clear picture of strengths, limitations, and inconsistencies across all HR processes.
2. Gap Analysis & Opportunity Identification
We evaluated:
· Missing or outdated processes
· Tools that weren’t being used to their full potential
· Manual processes that could be streamlined
· Areas where duplication increased workload
· Opportunities for integration or simplification
· Risks related to compliance or documentation gaps
3. Team Alignment & Priorities
Through collaborative conversations, we gathered insight into:
· What the team needed most from their HR systems
· Pain points that impacted efficiency or employee experience
· Long-term organizational goals
· Where scalability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness were most critical
This ensured the roadmap reflected both operational needs and staff perspectives.
4. Future-State Vision & Strategic Roadmap
Following the assessment, Pivot Partner produced a detailed visioning document that included:
· Prioritized opportunities for improvement
· Recommended system adjustments or upgrades
· Suggested process improvements
· Cost estimates for potential future projects
· A proposed timeline organized by phases (quick wins, mid-term, long-term)
THE PROGRESS
This engagement provided the organization with a clear understanding of where their HR systems excel and where strategic improvements could create a smoother, more cohesive employee experience. Leadership gained visibility into inefficiencies and opportunities, while employees benefited from improved clarity and more reliable processes. The roadmap created structure, direction, and confidence for future HR investments.
THE TAKEAWAY
For small organizations with growing operational demands, HR systems don’t need to be complex, they need to be intentional. By evaluating what’s working and what needs refinement, the organization now has a strategic path forward that prioritizes efficiency, employee experience, and sustainable growth. This pivot transformed uncertainty into a clear, actionable plan for a cohesive HR foundation.
Disclaimer: The example and project description shared through this pivot reflect anonymized summaries of prior consulting work completed by the founder in various professional capacities. Specific client names and identifying details have been omitted to protect confidentiality and comply with prior engagement agreements. These examples are intended to illustrate areas of expertise and typical outcomes achieved through similar engagements.
